Bikers Met by Paramilitary Forces: Riding in California is Now Considered a Threat?

Paramilitary policing is a reality in California.

The largest state police organization in the country openly describes themselves as a paramilitary organization. The California Highway Patrol Cadet page states, “The California Highway Patrol is often described as a “paramilitary” department, and that is true. The uniforms, ranks and insignias, chain of command, and the long-standing traditions resemble a military organization.” There is zero dispute than California law enforcement is highly militarized.

Case Study: Paso Robles California

Date: June 19th, 2015

On June 19th, in Paso Robles, California, officers from departments all throughout the county surrounded the police station as a precautionary measure because the Vagos motorcycle club was expected to “ride through town.” Streets were closed with barricades between and around the police department. The Vagos motorcycle club, authorities argued, has been known to have a particular distaste for the police.

If “distaste for the police” is the criteria law enforcement uses to justify massive militarized responses, no one in America is safe.

AgenciMultiple-agencies-600x450es in attendance included the Atascadero Police Department, Arroyo Grande Police Department, Grover Beach Police Department, San Luis Obispo County Probation Department, California Highway Patrol and the San Luis Obispo Police Department.

In light of the recent shootout in Waco Texas, the backup support was brought in. On June 19th, there were officers stationed around the station wearing bullet-proof vests, acting as potential, “bullet bouncers,” according to a San Luis officer interviewed by the Paso Robles Daily News.

The operation defies logic. A massive, multi-agency militarized task force based on no specific threat or report of a threat?  A massive multi-agency military-style operation to fortify the police station and City Hall based on nothing but stereotype and fear. In fact, citizens reported in calls and emails that “they’d never seen anything like it.  Some of them felt unnerved and unsafe.”

When challenged to justify the operation, the Paso Robles Chief of Police Robert Burton said his department upped enforcement “to help protect the community against a documented gang organization and be prepared in case violence broke out.”

No particularized threat. No reasonable suspicion. No probable cause to believe that a violent crime was occurring, or was about to occur. Promoting mass fear based on unrelated incidents that have zero to do with Paso Robles. In fact, the opposite was true and this fact is acknowledged by authorities.

Police acknowledge that there was no specific threat or danger. No threats against police. Police admit that they have never had any problems with the Vagos or any motorcycle clubs in Paso Robles.  Nothing but unrelated tragedies used to promote fear in order to justify a militarized response to a non-emergency situation.

Imagine the amount of resources involved in an operation of this scope. The overtime. The equipment. The planning. A gross mismanagement and expenditure of public resources based on zero actual threat.  The only measurable result was to further instill fear in average citizens watching the American police state in action and the unconscionable waste of precious public dollars. This should disgust and infuriate every American.

Citizens must unite in the grassroots effort to end militarized policing in America by proposing and supporting policies and legislation designed to reverse militarized law enforcement. We must get active.

We need solutions that limit the circumstances in which SWAT or other paramilitary teams are deployed and solutions that reinforce the distinct differences between a militarized and tactical mindset and community policing. High powered tactical units should be reserved for the rare emergencies where there is probable cause to believe that there is a violent crime occurring, or there is an imminent threat that it will occur without police intervention. (See: How To Prevent Another Militarized Police Massacre)

It is imperative that we strive for a society in which we do not look for a police officer and instead see a soldier.

David “Double D”  Devereaux is the Spokesperson for the Washington State Confederation of Clubs and US Defenders,  The Motorcycle Profiling Project, and also works with the Confederation of Clubs and US Defenders at the national level. Contact: doubled@motorcycleprofilingproject.com, motorcycleprofilingproject.com)

 

This article obtained it’s factual information from the following sources:

*see Paso Robles Daily News,  Police take security precautions for biker gang, June 19, 2015)

*see KSBY 6, Paso Robles Police Chief defends response to biker gangs, June 22, 2015)

3 thoughts on “Bikers Met by Paramilitary Forces: Riding in California is Now Considered a Threat?

  1. Decent article. However, I am a bit concerned that if all these bikers rolled through why are there no photos posted? Even a GOOGLE search turns up nothing.

    Like

  2. First they came for the bikers and I said nothing because I wasn’t one of them.
    Then they came for the veterans and I said nothing because I wasn’t one of them…

    Excellent Article.

    Like

  3. The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385, original at 20 Stat. 152) signed on June 18, 1878 by President Rutherford B. Hayes. The purpose of the act – in concert with the Insurrection Act of 1807 – is to limit the powers of the federal government in using its military personnel to act as domestic law enforcement personnel. It was passed as an amendment to an army appropriation bill following the end of Reconstruction, and was subsequently updated in 1959 and 1981.

    What is happening is the state and municipal police departments are effectively circumventing this law, in spirit and action.

    In the mid-20th century, the administration of President Dwight D. Eisenhower used an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act, derived from the Enforcement Acts, to send federal troops into Little Rock, Arkansas, during the 1957 school desegregation crisis. The Arkansas governor had opposed desegregation after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1954 in the Brown v. Board of Education that segregated public schools were unconstitutional. The Enforcement Acts, among other powers, allow the President to call up military forces when state authorities are either unable or unwilling to suppress violence that is in opposition to the constitutional rights of the people.[3]

    The last sentence here sounds like a potential avenue of relief for violation of civil rights. Perhaps the Southern Law Center could help.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s